Tanner v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
SIMPSON, Justice.
The defendant was convicted of receiving stolen property of an an^bunt in value sufficient to make the offense punishable as grand larceny. She appealed from that sentence.
The Court of Appeals affirmed and appellant has brought the case here for review. We are in disagreement with the opinion of that court with respect to one proposition treated which is vital to an affirmance of the judgment..
The Court of Appeals held admissible an ex parte affidavit introduced by the State executed by a furniture dealer, one Janney, addressed “To Whom it May Concern,” and post-dating the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Morgan v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
- Gibson v. GainesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Brenner v. LesherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Sinclair Refining Co. v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
- Baker v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1951
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Satterwhite v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
- Chatom v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
- Humphrey v. BoschungSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
- Tanner v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1953
- Eldridge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.