Sinclair Refining Co. v. Robertson
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
FOSTER, Justice.
This is an action on an account stated. The appeal is from a judgment granting defendant a new trial after a verdict and judgment for plaintiff. The new trial was granted on the ground that the verdict was contrary to the great weight of the evidence. On a review of the Court of Appeals affirming the lower court in that regard, we will not reverse that court in respect to its conclusions and inferences of fact dependent upon conflicting evidence or where there are conflicting inferences which may be reasonably drawn from evidence which is not conflicting. Rainey v. State, 245…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rainey v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
- Comer & Co. v. Way & EdmundsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
- Loventhal & Son v. MorrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
- Barber v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
- Walker v. Trotter Bros.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1915
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Sparks v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
- Osborne v. CobbSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
- Ellen Gregg Ingalls v. Ingalls Iron Works CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
- Tanner v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.