Norris v. Cupp
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.
In this petition for post-conviction relief, ORS 138.510 et seq, petitioner challenges the constitutionality of ORS 163.105, under which he received two consecutive terms of life imprisonment with minimum twenty-year sentences for aggravated murder. The post-conviction court denied relief, and we affirm.
Petitioner was convicted of two counts of aggravated murder and one charge of attempted murder. The murders meet the definition of “aggravated murder,” because there were two victims. ORS 163.095(2)(c). The provision under which defendant was sentenced then provided in pertinent part:
“Nothwiths…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. ShumwayOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Tuel v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1963
- State v. WarnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
- State v. NorrisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
- State v. LippertCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. LawlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- State v. SpinneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- Norris v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- State v. OslundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- State v. HoltermanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.