State v. Spinney
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.
This is a challenge to the constitutionality of Oregon’s Sentencing Guidelines (guidelines). The question is whether the guidelines violate Article I, section 15; Article I, section 16; or Article III, section 1, of the Oregon Constitution.
Defendant was convicted of first degree burglary, ORS 164.225, and second degree kidnapping. ORS 163.225. Under the guidelines, he had a sentencing grid classification of 9-C. The trial court found “no substantial and compelling reasons” to impose a departure sentence. OAR 253-08-001. Pursuant to the guidelines, defendant was sentenced to 56 months in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- State v. ShumwayOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Cannon v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1955
- State Ex Rel. Bushman v. VandenbergOregon Supreme Court · 1955
- State v. TurnerOregon Supreme Court · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. LawlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- State v. RiceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- State v. ChristmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.