Legal Opinion
People v. Ringer
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 23, 1988PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*643The defendant stands convicted of robbery in the first degree on the basis of evidence consisting primarily of statements made to the police. At a Huntley hearing, the arresting officer testified in pertinent part as follows:
"Q. * * * Officer Vance, did you have any further conversation with the Mr. Ringer?
"A. Yes, I did.
"Q. What, if anything, did you say to him and what did he say to you?
"A. * * * Mr. Ringer told me that he did not wish to make a statement, that he wanted an attorney and he did not wish to make any statement at all.
"Q. All right. Do you recall him specifically saying he…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. HuntleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1965
- People v. CunninghamNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. FelderNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. AveniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. AveniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012