Legal Opinion

People v. Ringer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 23, 1988PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*643The defendant stands convicted of robbery in the first degree on the basis of evidence consisting primarily of statements made to the police. At a Huntley hearing, the arresting officer testified in pertinent part as follows:

"Q. * * * Officer Vance, did you have any further conversation with the Mr. Ringer?
"A. Yes, I did.
"Q. What, if anything, did you say to him and what did he say to you?
"A. * * * Mr. Ringer told me that he did not wish to make a statement, that he wanted an attorney and he did not wish to make any statement at all.
"Q. All right. Do you recall him specifically saying he…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. People v. HuntleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1965
  4. People v. CunninghamNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. People v. FelderNew York Court of Appeals · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. AveniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. People v. AveniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API