Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration between L. A. Wenger Contracting Co. & Temple Emanu-El of East Meadow
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 8, 1966PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtJack Stanislaw, J.
In July of 1959 petitioner Wenger and respondent Temple Emanu-El entered into a building contract, Wenger to perform as general contractor. There was an arbitration clause in this contract (art. 40) and by June, 1963 it had become the focal point of the agreement. Several disputes arose between the parties which they attempted to resolve privately and informally at first. When these efforts failed the temple served its demand for arbitration on September 3, 1963. It asked arbitration of its claim of $50,000 against both petitioner and the architects who were also a party to the building…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mtr. of River Brand Rice Mills v. Latrobe Brew. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1953
- In re the Arbitration between Spectrum Fabrics Corp. & Main Street Fashions, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
- In re the Arbitration between Spectrum Fabrics Corp. & Main Street Fashions, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1955
- Milton L. Ehrlich, Inc. v. Swiss Construction Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1960
- In re the Arbitration between Davis & Temple Emanu-El of East MeadowNew York Supreme Court · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re the Arbitration between Davis & Temple Emanu-El of East MeadowNew York Supreme Court · 1966