In re the Arbitration between Davis & Temple Emanu-El of East Meadow
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJack Stanislaw, J.
Petitioners Davis, Brody and Wisniewski (a firm of architects) move to strike certain new matter from the demand of the respondent Temple Emann-El in arbitration. The Temple served its initial demand for arbitration on or about September 3,1963.
Davis’ first knowledge of any increase in the demand came by a copy of a letter dated February 11, 1965, addressed to the American Arbitration Association by the Temple requesting the amendment of its claim. This amendment was objected to by Davis’ attorney in his letter similarly addressed. On August 6, 1965, Davis received a bill of particulars of…
2Cited by2 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between Davis & Temple Emanu-El of East MeadowNew York Supreme Court · 1966
- In re the Arbitration between L. A. Wenger Contracting Co. & Temple Emanu-El of East MeadowNew York Supreme Court · 1966