In re the Arbitration between Davis & Temple Emanu-El of East Meadow

Petitioners’ motion for leave to reargue is granted. Proceeding then to an examination of the substance *1068of the factors putatively affecting the prior determination (49 Misc 2d 251), we find them without substantial significance. The argument that respondent’s noncompliance with statutory requirements as to notice warrants granting of the relief sought by petitioners is rejected.

The point is that respondent claims it simply amended a demand already in arbitration. Petitioners are trying to treat these figures added, instead, as a new claim, and they moved to have it barred as untimely. They…