Legal Opinion

Amason v. City of El Dorado

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 28, 1983No. 83-162PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Steele Hays, Justice.

The primary issue here is whether the Arkansas civil service statutes for policemen and firemen require that a vacancy in the office of chief of police must be filled by promotion from within the ranks of the police department. The trial court correctly held that our statutes contain no such requirement.

In January, 1983, the Chief of Police of the City of El Dorado resigned. The El Dorado Civil Service Commission promptly advertised for applicants having “at least ten years experience in law enforcement.” There were six candidates, five of whom were employed by the El…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hice v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  2. Patrick v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  3. Holt v. HowardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  4. Connor v. Ricks, MayorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
  5. Raines v. BolickSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Virden v. RoperSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  2. Pinkston v. General Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1990
  3. Second Injury Fund v. YarbroughCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1986
  4. Leathers v. WS Compton Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  5. Bennett v. Blytheville Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API