Legal Opinion
Holt v. Howard
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided November 15, 1943No. 4-7156PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcFaddin, J.
This appeal requires the construction of § 339 of Pope’s Digest, (which is § 1 of Act 193 of 1929) consisting of one sentence of 419 words.
There are several stock districts in Carroll county which, together, embrace a majority of the area of the county. Each of these districts whs organized by the county court pursuant to Act 156 of 1915, with amendments. There is no stock district in Carroll county created by act of the legislature. In December, 1942, appellees, C. L. Howard and others, attempting to proceed under § 339 of Pope’s Digest, filed in the Carroll county court a petition signed by…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McDonald v. WassonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
- Smith v. GarretsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
- Johnson v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
- Wright v. BaddersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Ark. State Highway Comm. v. MabrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
- Henderson v. RussellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
- Locke v. CookSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
- Hice v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
- Cromer v. JW Jones Construction CompanyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1968
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.