Legal Opinion
Smith v. Nevin
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided December 10, 1934No. Patent Appeal 3353PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRAHAM, Presiding Judge.
The United States Patent Office declared two interferences. The first was between the application of the appellant, Arthur E. Smith, filed March 25,1927, serial No. 178389, and an application of the appellee, Mendel Nevin, filed July 3, 1926, serial No. 120417, and was numbered 58513. The subject-matter of this interference was a combination of a hypodermic syringe and ampoule to be used therewith. This interference included one count and was declared June 18, 1929.
The other interference involved was declared June 30, 1930, and involved an application of the appellee,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Corona Cord Tire Co. v. Dovan Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Clark Thread Co. v. Willimantic Linen Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Payne v. HurleyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934
- Urschel v. CrawfordCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934
- Fink v. HumelCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Field v. Knowles. Field v. KnowlesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
- Toledo Scale Corporation v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Westinghouse Electric Corporation v. Toledo Scale CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965
- Ajem Laboratories, Inc., and Centri-Spray Corporation v. C. M. Ladd Co., Inc., and Charles M. LaddCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
- Armour and Company v. Wilson & Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1958
- Clinton W. MacMullen and Alfred Marzocchi v. Thomas R. Santelli, Thomas R. Santelli v. Clinton W. MacMullen and Alfred MarzocchiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.