Legal Opinion

Urschel v. Crawford

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 3, 1934No. 3337PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGarrett, Judge

Urschel, the junior party, has here appealed from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office, affirming a decision of the Examiner of Interferences, awarding priority to Crawford, the senior party, upon count 3 of an interference, reading:

3. An axle for vehicles comprising a tubular member having reduced end portions of increased thickness and formed to receive bearing members of stub axles of the vehicles.

Four other counts were originally involved, but, as to these, the Board of Appeals, reversing the decision of the Examiner of Interferences, awarded priority to>…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Smith v. NevinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934
  4. Ernest D. Garrett v. Joseph B. CoxCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
  5. Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API