Olberding v. Illinois Central Railroad
Supreme Court of the United States
1Dissent
Mr. Justice Reed, with whom Mr. Justice Minton joins,
dissenting.
The unfortunate effect of this decision on federal venue, its uniformity and availability, in so important a field as torts by out-of-state motorists, causes me to dissent from the views of the Court. Under Neirbo Co. v. Bethlehem Corp., 308 U. S. 165, a different doctrine of venue would be applied to motor torts committed by foreign corporations doing business in a state than is applied to an individual motorist driving his own car through a state. From the opinion I would assume that a corporation not doing business in a state…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hess v. PawloskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Neirbo Co. v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Knott Corporation v. FurmanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947
- Steele v. DennisDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1945
- Krueger v. HiderDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1943
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.