Legal Opinion
Krueger v. Hider
District Court, E.D. South Carolina
Decided February 2, 1943No. Civil Action 921PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WARING, District Judge.
A motion has been made in the above' entitled cause to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. It appears that this suit grows out of an automobile collision, which occurred within the Eastern District of South Carolina (Orangeburg Division). The plaintiff was and is a resident of the State of Ohio, and the defendant of the State of New York. This cause is one where the automobile collision out of which the suit arose occurred in this District and' there is a diversity of citizenship between the plaintiff and the defendant and the amount involved is over $3,000. It,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hess v. PawloskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Neirbo Co. v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Lee v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Bagdon v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Williams v. JamesDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1940
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- McCoy v. SilerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
- Morrison v. Budget Rent A Car Systems, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Knott Corporation v. FurmanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947
- Martin v. Fischbach Trucking Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1950
- Steele v. DennisDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1945
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.