Legal Opinion
Houchin Sales Co. v. Angert
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided February 10, 1926No. 6913, 6914PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KENYON, Circuit Judge.
As both of these eases arise out of the same facts, we consider them together. The Ferguson-McKinney Company is now in the hands of a receiver, and the receiver has been substituted as a party here. For convenience we shall refer to the parties as the Houehin Sales Company and the Ferguson-McKinney Company; the Houehin Sales Company being appellant in No. 6913 and appellee in No. 6914, while the receiver for the Ferguson-McKinney Company is appellee in No. 6913 and appellant in No. 6914. We first consider No. 6914 as our conclusion therein is practically determinative of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- WHITING v. the Bank of the United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
- Toof v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Coder v. ArtsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- Clement Woodward, in Error v. James Brown, and Sarah Jane, His Wife, in ErrorSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
- In re GilbertDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1902
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Zahn v. FinkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Central Republic Bank & Trust Co. v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- Keeler v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
- Automobile Ins. Co. v. Barnes-Manley Wet Wash Laundry Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
- Board of Trustees v. RTKL Associates, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1989
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.