Legal Opinion
United States v. Daniel J. Fern
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided September 23, 1998No. 95-4099, 95-4596PublishedCited by 68 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HATCHETT, Chief Judge:
Upon motion for reconsideration, the prior panel opinion, reported at 117 F.3d 1298, is withdrawn, and the following opinion is substituted in its stead.
In this consolidated appeal, we affirm the convictions of Daniel Fern for mail fraud, attempted witness tampering and violations of the Clean Air Act.
FACTS
The events leading up to Fern’s indictment and eventual convictions began on October 3, 1993. Early that morning, a fire partially damaged the Monte Carlo Oceanfront Resort Hotel, a thirteen-story building on Miami Beach. The Monte Carlo was insured for up to two…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- Chester McCoy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Ignasio Maldenaldo Sanchez, United States of America v. Santiago Gilberto SanchezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Amadou Fall NdiayeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
- United States v. SuniaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- United States v. McGarityCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.