Legal Opinion
United States v. Amadou Fall Ndiaye
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided January 6, 2006No. 04-11283PublishedCited by 112 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MILLS, District Judge:
We deal here with illegal aliens and Social Security fraud.
Of the original 28 defendants indicted, we are concerned with only four of them: Ndiaye, Sumbodo, Aimasiko and Diaw.
The copious and voluminous record here lays the case before us, including a three-week jury trial and a sentencing hearing.
In sum, we affirm.
I. INTRODUCTION
On November 20, 2002, a grand jury returned an indictment charging Amadou Fall Ndiaye, Agung Sumbodo, Emmanuel Aimasiko, Malene Diaw and 24 other defendants with violating 18 U.S.C. § 371 by a conspiracy to commit identification documentation…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Michelson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by112 opinions
- Edwards v. Prime, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- United States v. McNairCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- United States v. MaxwellCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
- United States v. SnipesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- United States v. CaraballoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.