Legal Opinion

Wheat v. McNeill

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 12, 1931No. Docket No. 4228PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MR. JUSTICE PLUMMER Delivered the Opinion of the Court.

Plaintiff prosecutes this appeal from a judgment entered after order sustaining without leave to amend a general and special demurrer to the plaintiff’s second amended complaint. The action was brought to have set aside and vacated a judgment theretofore recov cred by the respondent against the plaintiff in the Superior Court of the State of California, in and for the County of Los Angeles, wherein the respondent D. A. McNeill was plaintiff and the appellant Carl 0. Wheat was defendant.

The record before us shows the following:

That on…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hammell v. BrittonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Riskin v. TowersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. State Furniture Co. v. AbramsNebraska Supreme Court · 1945
  4. McCue v. Bruce Enterprises, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. Cox v. WestlingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API