United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Samuels
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.
The principal question presented is whether this bond covers the action of Wollitz which resulted in the injury complained of; it being contended by counsel for the surety company that the condition of the bond that Wollitz would “faithfully perform the duties of the office of policeman” had the effect only of a guaranty that he would not violate his oath to faithfully, honestly, and impartially discharge his duties as an officer, nor exceed the powers conferred upon him as such officer. It is not claimed that the injury to the plaintiff was not caused by Wollitz while the latter was in the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- American Guaranty Co. v. McNieceOhio Supreme Court · 1924
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. BoehnleinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. McDiarmidOhio Supreme Court · 1927
3Cited by24 opinions
- Commerce & Industry Insurance v. City of ToledoOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Commisso v. MeekerNew York Court of Appeals · 1960
- Eubanks v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
- Scot Lad Foods, Inc. v. Secretary of StateOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- Agnew v. PorterOhio Supreme Court · 1970
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.