Legal Opinion

Maryland Casualty Co. v. McDiarmid

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1927No. 20035PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

Two questions are presented here:(1) Is a bond such as here under consideration one upon which the obligor may be compelled to respond in an action by the person injured by the malfeasance of a police officer, upon the faithfulness of whose conduct the bond is conditioned, or does the bond run only to the benefit of the obligee named therein, the city of Dayton?(2) Is an action upon such bond barred by the provisions of Section 11225, General Code, after one year from the date the cause of action accrued?

We are not advised, either by the pleadings or by the evidence, of the existence of a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ahsmuhs v. BowyerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. SamuelsOhio Supreme Court · 1927
  2. State Ex Rel. White v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Cusack v. McGrainOhio Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Neisius v. HenryNebraska Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Citizens Banking & Savings Co. v. Spitzer, Rorick & Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API