Legal Opinion

Minnesota Chippewa Tribe v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 8, 1982No. Nos. 19 and 189-APublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

This case comes before the court on defendant’s motions to dismiss plaintiffs’ Exceptions Nos. 14, 15, 16, and 27 on the ground of res judicata. It is one of several related cases brought under the Indian Claims Commission Act of 1946, 60 Stat. 1049, docket Nos. 19,188,189-A, 189-B, 189-C, and *73719 and 189-A consolidated. Defendant asserts that these issues are foreclosed because they were dismissed with prejudice by the Indian Claims Commission (Commission) and plaintiffs failed to seek a timely rehearing. Alternatively, defendant asserts that these issues are foreclosed because, Commission…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. Sioux Nation of IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. United States v. United States Smelting Refining & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. United States v. Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa IndiansUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
  4. Chippewa Indians of Minn. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. The Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Berthold Reservation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Minnesota Chippewa Tribe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API