Legal Opinion

The Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Berthold Reservation v. The United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided February 16, 1968No. Appeal 2-66PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COLLINS, Judge.

This is an appeal from an interlocutory order, findings of fact, and opinion of the Indian Claims Commission (hereinafter the “Commission”). Appellant claims that the United States, under the Act of June 1, 1910, 36 Stat. 455, deprived it of part of its reservation lands without the payment of just compensation and, in some instances, without the payment of any compensation. Under that act, to be discussed in more detail infra, the United States (1) sold part of the reservation to homesteaders and credited the proceeds of the sales to appellant; (2) purchased certain…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Lone Wolf v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Tiger v. Western Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Shoshone Tribe of Indians v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Cherokee Nation v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  5. Tee-Hit-Ton Indians v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. United States v. Sioux Nation of IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Navajo Tribe of Indians v. State of New MexicoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  3. Fred E. Langenegger, Steven W. Langenegger v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  4. Coast Indian Community v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1977
  5. Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API