Legal Opinion
Pauls Valley Travel Center v. Boucher
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 3, 2005No. 100,169PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtOpala, J.
¶ 1 The broader question presented for our review is whether the Court of Civil Appeals (COCA) failed to apply the proper standard of review when it vacated the three-judge panel’s award for medical treatment and compensation. The narrow issue before us is whether the trial tribunal’s order — that claimant’s injury was not idiopathic but com-pensable because it arose out of her employment — is supported by competent evidence.
L
ANATOMY OE THE LITIGATION
¶2 The facts are uncontested. Stephany Maurine Boucher (claimant or Boucher), a cashier 2 employed by the Pauls Valley Travel Center…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Parks v. Norman Municipal HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Thomas v. Keith Hensel Optical LabsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- American Management Systems, Inc. v. BurnsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- H. J. Jeffries Truck Line v. GrishamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
- R. J. Allison, Inc. v. BolingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Davis v. Southwestern Bell TelephoneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- MULLENDORE v. MERCY HOSPITAL ARDMORESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019
- Yzer, Inc. v. RodrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012
- MULLENDORE v. MERCY HOSPITAL ARDMORESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019
- Wilcoxson v. WOODWARD COUNTY EMSCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.