James v. County of Yates Sheriff's Department
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1DissentLawton, J.
I respectfully dissent. I agree with petitioner that Matter of Balcerak v County of Nassau (94 NY2d 253) stands only for the limited proposition that a determination by the Workers’ Compensation Board that an injury is work-related does not per se entitle an injured employee to benefits under General Municipal Law § 207-c and that the Court’s further statement in Balcerak (94 NY2d at 259) concerning the “heightened risks and duties” standard to be met before benefits may be awarded under section 207-c is merely dicta. Subsequent Appellate Division decisions have inconsistently applied that…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Balcerak v. County of NassauNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- White v. County of CortlandNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Ertner v. County of ChenangoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Sutherland v. Village of SuffernAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Clements v. PanzarellaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.