Legal Opinion · Dissent

James v. County of Yates Sheriff's Department

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 30, 2002Published

1DissentLawton, J.

I respectfully dissent. I agree with petitioner that Matter of Balcerak v County of Nassau (94 NY2d 253) stands only for the limited proposition that a determination by the Workers’ Compensation Board that an injury is work-related does not per se entitle an injured employee to benefits under General Municipal Law § 207-c and that the Court’s further statement in Balcerak (94 NY2d at 259) concerning the “heightened risks and duties” standard to be met before benefits may be awarded under section 207-c is merely dicta. Subsequent Appellate Division decisions have inconsistently applied that…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Balcerak v. County of NassauNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. White v. County of CortlandNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Ertner v. County of ChenangoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  4. Sutherland v. Village of SuffernAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  5. Clements v. PanzarellaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API