Clements v. Panzarella
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*5OPINION OF THE COURT
Ritter, J.P.
The petitioners, Warren Clements and Raymond Rice, police officers with the respondent Incorporated Village of Málveme (hereinafter the Village), commenced this proceeding pursuant to CPLR 7803 (3) to annul two determinations of the Village denying them benefits pursuant to General Municipal Law § 207-c for injuries sustained while on duty. The Supreme Court granted the Village’s motion pursuant to CPLR 7804 (f) to dismiss the petition. We affirm. Clements and Rice failed to demonstrate that their respective injuries were incurred in the performance of special…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Santangelo v. State of NYNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Zanghi v. Niagara Frontier Transportation CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Cooper v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Galapo v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- Balcerak v. County of NassauNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Stalter v. ScarpatoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Theroux v. ReillyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Wagman v. KapicaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Gallante v. ReillyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Gallante v. ReillyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.