Legal Opinion
Pero v. Corley
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided May 7, 1924PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
The declaration herein does not wholly fail to state a cause of action, therefore the demurrer thereto should have been overruled. See Wertz v. Tampa Electric Co., 78 Fla. 405, 83 South. Rep. 270; Peterson v. Oscar Daniels Co., 83 Fla. 29, 90 South. Rep. 621.
The judgment rendered on the demurrer is reversed.
Whitfield, P. J., and West and Terrell, J. J., concur..
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Peterson v. Oscar Daniels Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1922
- Wertz v. Tampa Electric Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1919
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cummings Machine Works v. ClarkSupreme Court of Florida · 1925
- Carlton v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1928
- Gregg Corp. v. BurdineSupreme Court of Florida · 1930