Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Cummings Machine Works v. Clark

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 7, 1925PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The declaration herein does not wholly fail to state a cause of action, therefore the demurrer should not have been sustained. McDonald v. Exchange Supply Co., 88 Fla. 80, 101 South. Rep. 28; Pero v. Corlet, 87 Fla. 448, 10 South. Rep. 748.

Reversed.

West, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Browne and Terrell, J. J., concur.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McDonald v. Exchange Supply Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1924
  2. State v. AllenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
  3. Pero v. CorleySupreme Court of Florida · 1924

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ballas v. Lake Weir Light & Water Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1930
  2. Garsed v. SugarmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
  3. Carlton v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1928
  4. Brown v. Pennsylvania Sugar CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1928
  5. Harford v. GravesSupreme Court of Florida · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API