Carlton v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Florida
1Per curiam
The amended declaration herein does not wholly fail to state a cause of action, therefore, the demurrer thereto should have been overruled. Wertz v. Tampa Electric Co., 78 Fla. 405, 83 South. Rep. 270; Peterson v. Oscar Daniels Co., 83 Fla. 29, 90 South. Rep. 621; Pero v. Corley, 87 Fla. 448, 100 South. Rep. 748; Foster v. St. Johns Electric Co., 86 Fla. 338, 98 South. Rep. 75; McDonald v. Exchange Supply Co., 88 Fla. 80, 101 South. Rep. 28; Cummings Mach. Works v. Clark, 89 Fla. 383, 105 South. Rep. 100; Hawkins v. Shore Acres Properties, 93 Fla. 670, 112 South. Rep. 61; Yon v. Pinellas…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Peterson v. Oscar Daniels Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1922
- Wertz v. Tampa Electric Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1919
- McDonald v. Exchange Supply Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1924
- State v. AllenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
- Cummings Machine Works v. ClarkSupreme Court of Florida · 1925
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Greene v. Miller Et Ux.Supreme Court of Florida · 1931
- Boyle v. DolanSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
- Hammontree v. City of TampaSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
- Gregg Corp. v. BurdineSupreme Court of Florida · 1930