Legal Opinion
Fraternal Order of Police, Lodge 108 v. City of Ardmore
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 19, 2002No. 95,131PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtOpala, J.
1 1 Two dispositive issues are presented on certiorari: [1] Are probationary police officers to be considered "permanent members" of the police department for invocation of grievance arbitration rights under the terms of the Fire and Police Arbitration Act (FPAA) 2 ? and [2] Does the PERB have statutory authority to determine the membership status of a collective bargaining unit? We answer the first question in the negative and the second in the affirmative.
I
THE ANATOMY OF LITIGATION
12 All the facts in this controversy were submitted to the PERB and to the district court by stipulation. FOP…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Kluver v. Weatherford Hospital AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Oral Roberts University v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- United States Postal Service v. American Postal Workers Union, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
- City of Bethany v. Public Employees Relations BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- McClure v. ConocoPhillips Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- Pentagon Academy, Inc. v. Independent School District No. 1 of Tulsa CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- Wall v. MaroukSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
- CITY OF JENKS v. STONESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
- CITY OF JENKS v. STONESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.