Legal Opinion · Dissent

Rogde v. United Van Bus Delivery

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 11, 1983No. C7-82-730Published

1DissentTodd, Justice

I respectfully dissent. My review of the record convinces me that it discloses substantial evidentiary support for the finding that as a result of his work-related injury employee has continued to be temporarily totally disabled since November 26, 1979, when relators discontinued payment of compensation to him. This finding justifies the award of continuing temporary total disability benefits from that time (with the exception of intermittent periods of employment between February and June 1980 and a 60-day period of incarceration beginning in August 1980).1

Employee, a 59-year-old…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Schulte v. CH PETERSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANYSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  2. Scott v. Southview Chevrolet Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  3. Findorff v. Pinkerton's, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. Smith v. Armour and Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API