Legal Opinion
Pescatrice v. Orovitz
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided March 25, 2008No. 07-60653-CIV-COHNPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
JAMES I. COHN, District Judge.
THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [DE 63] and Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [DE 66]. The Court has carefully considered the mo tions, responses, and replies thereto, and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. The motions became ripe on March 12, 2008.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Nancy Pescatrice (“Plaintiff’) filed an Amended Complaint against an attorney and law firm (“Defendants”)…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Sandra Jackson v. BellSouth TelecommunicationsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Jessie Walker v. Thomas E. Darby, Hugh L. Robinson, Jr., and Kenneth DayCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Campuzano-Burgos v. Midland Credit Management., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Jacques v. U.S. Bank N.A. (In Re Jacques)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2009
- Gaisser v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2008
- Sanz v. FernandezDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2009
- Battle v. Gladstone Law Group, P.A.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2013
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.