Pratt v. District of Columbia Housing Authority
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
FARRELL, Associate Judge:
In two recent decisions upholding evictions from federally-subsidized housing accommodations, Scarborough v. Winn Residential L.L.P./Atlantic Terrace Apartments, 890 A.2d 249 (D.C.2006), and Calloway v. District of Columbia Hous. Autk, 916 A.2d 888 (D.C.2006), this court held that the statutory federal “one-strike” policy embedded in lease provisions permitting eviction for criminal activity displaces — when applied to such activity — a District of Columbia statute generally allowing tenants an opportunity to correct or “cure” lease violations and thereby avoid…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Edmond v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Department of Housing and Urban Development v. RuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Parreco v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Connie Burton v. Tampa Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
- Scarborough v. Winn Residential L.L.P.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- CorpCar Services Houston, LTD v. Carey Licensing, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2024
- Hattix v. District of Columbia Housing AuthorityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2025
- Hattix v. District of Columbia Housing AuthorityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2025