Legal Opinion

Pratt v. District of Columbia Housing Authority

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided February 21, 2008No. 05-CV-559PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FARRELL, Associate Judge:

In two recent decisions upholding evictions from federally-subsidized housing accommodations, Scarborough v. Winn Residential L.L.P./Atlantic Terrace Apartments, 890 A.2d 249 (D.C.2006), and Calloway v. District of Columbia Hous. Autk, 916 A.2d 888 (D.C.2006), this court held that the statutory federal “one-strike” policy embedded in lease provisions permitting eviction for criminal activity displaces — when applied to such activity — a District of Columbia statute generally allowing tenants an opportunity to correct or “cure” lease violations and thereby avoid…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Edmond v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Department of Housing and Urban Development v. RuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Parreco v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Connie Burton v. Tampa Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
  5. Scarborough v. Winn Residential L.L.P.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. CorpCar Services Houston, LTD v. Carey Licensing, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2024
  2. Hattix v. District of Columbia Housing AuthorityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2025
  3. Hattix v. District of Columbia Housing AuthorityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API