United States v. Ford Motor Co.
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TSOUCALAS, Senior Judge:
Plaintiff, the Bureau of Customs and Border Protection of the Department of Homeland Security (“Customs”), seeks collection of a civil penalty pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 1592 (1988), and customs duties concerning entries of vehicles and vehicle components made between 1987 and 1992 by defendant, Ford Motor Company (“Ford”). Customs alleges that Ford violated 19 U.S.C. § 1592 by acting grossly negligent or negligent in making false statements or omissions in connection with the entry of the merchandise at issue. Accordingly, Customs seeks civil penalties in the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Allen Organ Company, Cross-Appellee v. Kimball International, Inc., MacMillan Inc., and Conn Keyboards, Inc., Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- MacHinery Corporation of America v. Gullfiber Ab, Gullfiber International and Marvin SchneiderCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. (Surety for Carreon, Inc.) v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Barry L. Hale and Judson B. Hudson v. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Hitachi America, Ltd., Defendant/cross-Appellant, and Hitachi, Ltd., Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Optrex America, Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 2008
- United States v. Deladiep, Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 2017
- United States v. Lafidale, Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 2013
- United States v. NYCC 1959 Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 2015
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.