Legal Opinion

United States v. Lafidale, Inc.

United States Court of International Trade

Decided October 30, 2013No. Slip Op. 13-133; Court 12-00397PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

RESTANI, Judge:

Before the court is plaintiff United States’ motion for default judgment seeking $324,687.00 in civil penalties plus post judgment interest against defendant Lafidale, Inc. (“Lafidale”) for alleged grossly negligent violations of section 592(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, 19 U.S.C. § 1592(a) (2006). The complaint’s well-pled facts establish defendant’s liability for a civil penalty. As explained below, however, the penalty calculation offered by plaintiff appears to be internally inconsistent and to impose a penalty in excess of the statutory maximum. Plaintiffs…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  2. United States v. Rockwell International Corp.United States Court of International Trade · 1986
  3. United States v. Ford Motor Co.United States Court of International Trade · 2005

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. NYCC 1959 Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 2015
  2. United States v. Lafidale, Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 2014
  3. United States v. NYCC 1959 Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API