Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Henry

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1911PublishedCited by 22 opinions

FROM MONTGOMERY. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Montgomery County. • — W. L. Cooil, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Buchanan

This suit was brought for the use of the State of Tennessee for the purpose of collecting from the defendant *3951635.75, claimed on behalf of the State as a collateral inheritance tax on certain land in Montgomery county, Tennessee, to which the State insists that the defendent acquired title under item 4 of the will of Patrick Henry, deceased, which item reads:

“4. I give to my nephew, Gustavos A. Henry, the plantation in Montgomery County, Tenn., which I bought from E. W. Barker and wife, which is known as part of the dower tract of Oloverlands.”

The statute on which the suit is based is…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. AlstonTennessee Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Crenshaw v. MooreTennessee Supreme Court · 1911
  3. English v. CrenshawTennessee Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Kittel v. StegerTennessee Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Brakefield v. AndersonTennessee Supreme Court · 1889

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Earline Waddle v. Lorene B. ElrodTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Cobble v. LangfordTennessee Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Choate v. SewellTennessee Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Huffine v. McCampbellTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Michael Lancaster v. Ferrell Paving, Inc. v. Everest Indemnity Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2011

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API