Bailey v. Henry
Tennessee Supreme Court
FROM MONTGOMERY. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Montgomery County. • — W. L. Cooil, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Buchanan
This suit was brought for the use of the State of Tennessee for the purpose of collecting from the defendant *3951635.75, claimed on behalf of the State as a collateral inheritance tax on certain land in Montgomery county, Tennessee, to which the State insists that the defendent acquired title under item 4 of the will of Patrick Henry, deceased, which item reads:
“4. I give to my nephew, Gustavos A. Henry, the plantation in Montgomery County, Tenn., which I bought from E. W. Barker and wife, which is known as part of the dower tract of Oloverlands.”
The statute on which the suit is based is…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. AlstonTennessee Supreme Court · 1895
- Crenshaw v. MooreTennessee Supreme Court · 1911
- English v. CrenshawTennessee Supreme Court · 1908
- Kittel v. StegerTennessee Supreme Court · 1908
- Brakefield v. AndersonTennessee Supreme Court · 1889
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Earline Waddle v. Lorene B. ElrodTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
- Cobble v. LangfordTennessee Supreme Court · 1950
- Choate v. SewellTennessee Supreme Court · 1919
- Huffine v. McCampbellTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
- Michael Lancaster v. Ferrell Paving, Inc. v. Everest Indemnity Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2011
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.