Legal Opinion

Choate v. Sewell

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1919PublishedCited by 26 opinions

FROM FENTRESS. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Fentress County. —Hon. W. R. Officer, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Lansben

This is an action of ejectment. The chancellor dismissed the hill as it affected lands which were inclosed and occupied by defendants for more than seven years. Both sides have appealed.

The case Avas a jury ease, and there were two jury trials; but at the third and last trial the parties agreed to waive the actual presence of a jury, and submit the case to the chancellor. He found the facts upon which defendants relied in defendants’ favor, and dismissed the bill as above stated.

The first question to be determined is whether the case is triable de novo in this court. The complainant insists…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Toomey v. AtyoeTennessee Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Kittel v. StegerTennessee Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Bailey v. HenryTennessee Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Brakefield v. AndersonTennessee Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Beatty v. SchenckTennessee Supreme Court · 1912

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Majestic v. Louisville & NR Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1945
  2. Harris v. MorganTennessee Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Fonville v. GregoryTennessee Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Broch v. BrochTennessee Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Melhorn v. MelhornTennessee Supreme Court · 1961

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API