Firestone v. Schmehl
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Chief Justice Bell,
This is an appeal by Firestone * from a judgment non obstante veredicto. entered in favor of the defendant.
Plaintiff brought an action of trespass against defendant Helen Schmehl seeking to recover damages for injuries sustained when he was struck by an automobile operated-by defendant. -The jury returned a verdict in the amount of $20,012.39 in favor of plaintiff. Defendant filed a motion for judgment n.o.v. or alternatively for a new trial. The lower -Court granted judgment for defendant n.o.v. but stated that if judg ment n.o.v. was improper, then a new…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bohner v. Eastern Express, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Segriff v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Wood v. Conneaut Lake Park, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Menyo v. SpharSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- F. C. Haab Co. v. Peltz Street Terminals, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kresovich v. FitzsimmonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Mishkin v. Lancaster Redevelopment AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Murphy v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Cerino v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- Matulonis v. Reading RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.