Legal Opinion

Kresovich v. Fitzsimmons

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 22, 1970No. Appeal, No. 33PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Bell,

Plaintiffs Pauline Kresovich and Joseph Kresovich, her husband, instituted a trespass action against the defendants Catherine Fitzsimmons and Fred Creamer, executors of the Estate of Margaret Brockerhoff (hereinafter called the Estate), to recover damages for injuries allegedly sustained by the plaintiff-wife when she fell while walking on a sidewalk in front of and abutting defendants’ premises. The case was tried before a Judge and jury and resulted in a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs in the amount of $20,000. The Estate filed a motion for a new trial…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Bohner v. Eastern Express, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  2. Lerner v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  3. Miller v. Exeter BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. Quinn v. KumarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  5. Pro v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. FLICKINGER ESTATE v. RitskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Mike v. Borough of AliquippaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Peair v. Home Ass'n of Enola Legion No. 751Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Atkins v. URBAN REDEVELOPMENT AUTH., ETC.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Piekarski v. Club Overlook Estates, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API