Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Hilk

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 30, 1973No. 43529PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Knutson, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment entered in favor of plaintiff.

The facts giving rise to the cause of action are not seriously in dispute. They are taken from depositions, interrogatories, and pleadings. Merlin Hilk was engaged in farming. He purchased a personal and farm liability insurance policy from plaintiff, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, which obligated the company to “pay on behalf of the insured all sums which the insured shall become legally obligated to pay because of bodily injury, sustained by a farm employee of the insured while…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Perry v. TozerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  2. Westerlund v. Kettle River Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  3. Hacker v. BerknerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  4. Kronvall v. GarveySupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  5. Dahlen v. PolinskySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Northwestern College v. City of Arden HillsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Goblirsch v. Western Land Roller Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  3. Osendorf v. American Family Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. Castle Design & Development Co. v. City of Lake ElmoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API