Legal Opinion

United States v. Lee

U S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided June 1, 2005No. CGCMG 0191; Docket No. 1200PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMEL, Judge:

Appellant was tried by general court-martial, military judge alone. Pursuant to pleas *628of guilty, entered in accordance with a pretrial agreement, Appellant was convicted of two specifications of attempted wrongful possession of 20 tablets of Hydroeodone, a Schedule III controlled substance, one specification of attempted wrongful possession of 17 tablets of paracetamol, a Schedule III controlled substance, one specification of attempted wrongful possession of 72 tablets of nurofen, a Schedule III controlled substance, one specification of attempted wrongful introduction of 3.637…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. ColeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
  2. United States v. McCarthyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
  3. United States v. HuffmanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
  4. United States v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
  5. United States v. MosbyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Specialist GLENN M. BRADLEYArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2009
  2. United States v. KnoxU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2016
  3. United States v. KnoxU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API