Legal Opinion

People v. Byler

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 5, 1917No. Crim. No. 551PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tulare County, and from an order denying a new trial. J. A. Allen, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

WORKS, J., pro tem.

The appellant was tried under an information charging him with the murder of Frank Meadows, was found guilty of manslaughter, and was sentenced to four years’ imprisonment. At the time of the commission of the offense, Byler was over sixty years of age, while Meadows was about fifty; Byler was somewhat weakened by disease, Meadows was of unusual physical strength and proportions; both men were addicted to the use of liquor, and they were both probably intoxicated at the time of the tragedy; Byler certainly was. The killing occurred late at night, just outside Byler’s house,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. People v. AsheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  3. People v. ForsytheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. DowellIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
  2. State v. CopenbargerIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
  3. People v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  4. Gulf Transportation Co. v. Virginian Railway Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1932
  5. People v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API