Legal Opinion

Marchant v. New York Life Insurance

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided August 29, 1930No. 20273PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.)

1. A motion to dismiss a case upon the ground that under the pleadings and the evidence there can be no legal recovery is never a proper motion where the petition sets forth a cause of action, no matter whether the evidence fails, or to what extent it may fail, to sustain the allegations made. ■ Such a motion is different from a motion for a nonsuit, since it relates to the sufficiency both of the petition and of the evidence, while a motion for a nonsuit is in the' nature of a demurrer to the evidence only. In the brief filed in this court for the insurer,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Kelly v. Strouse & Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Cato v. Ætna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  3. Foglesong v. Modern Brotherhood of AmericaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1906
  4. Lobdill v. Laboring Men's Mutual Aid Ass'n of ChatfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  5. Lyon v. Railway Passenger Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1877

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. SouthSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  2. New York Life Insurance v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
  3. New York Life Insurance v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  4. Hayes v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n v. BirdSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API