Marchant v. New York Life Insurance
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.)
1. A motion to dismiss a case upon the ground that under the pleadings and the evidence there can be no legal recovery is never a proper motion where the petition sets forth a cause of action, no matter whether the evidence fails, or to what extent it may fail, to sustain the allegations made. ■ Such a motion is different from a motion for a nonsuit, since it relates to the sufficiency both of the petition and of the evidence, while a motion for a nonsuit is in the' nature of a demurrer to the evidence only. In the brief filed in this court for the insurer,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Kelly v. Strouse & Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Cato v. Ætna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
- Foglesong v. Modern Brotherhood of AmericaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1906
- Lobdill v. Laboring Men's Mutual Aid Ass'n of ChatfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- Lyon v. Railway Passenger Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1877
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. SouthSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
- New York Life Insurance v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
- New York Life Insurance v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
- Hayes v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1933
- Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n v. BirdSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.