Legal Opinion

Tectonics, Inc. v. Castle Const. Co., Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 3, 1986No. 85-269-CERPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This Court consented to answer the following question certified by the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama: "Whether the Supreme Court of Alabama would use the Small Business Act as a standard in determining fraud, unjust enrichment or interference with a business relationship" in a suit brought by the second lowest and unsuccessful bidder against the lowest and successful bidder on a government contract. Our answer to this certified question is "No."

On February 17, 1982, plaintiffs Tectonics, Inc., of Florida and Forest Builders, Inc., filed this lawsuit against…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Townsend v. McCallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  2. Mid-West Construction, Ltd. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  3. Tectonics, Inc. Of Florida v. Castle Construction Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  4. Royal Services, Inc. v. Maintenance, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Airline Const. v. Ascension Parish School BoardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
  2. Spring Hill Lighting & Supply Co. v. Square D Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  3. Summit Medical Associates, P.C. v. JamesDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1998
  4. Norman v. Southern Guaranty InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2002
  5. Integrity Management International, Inc. v. Tombs & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API