Legal Opinion
Mid-West Construction, Ltd. v. The United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided February 2, 1968No. 123-66PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIS, Judge.
Plaintiff, a Canadian corporation, submitted a bid for the construction of a road near Petersburg, Alaska, in response to an invitation with a total small business set-aside issued by the Forest Service of the Department of Agriculture in May 1964. (A total small business set-aside means that the entire award is to go to a “small business.”) After the bids were opened in June and plaintiff’s was determined to be low, the next low bidder, B & A and Yutan Construction Company (Yutan), protested that Mid-West was not a “small business” under 13 C.F.R. § 121.3-2(g) (1963), which…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- John Reiner & Company, Individually and to the Use of Kurz & Root Company (Incorporated) v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Whiteside v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Prestex Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- United States v. Penn Foundry & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Fox Valley Engineering Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Keco Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
- WRB Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
- Alabama Rural Fire Insurance Company, a Corporation v. Frank Naylor, Associate Administrator of the Farmers Home AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- JWK International Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Duke City Lumber Co. v. ButzDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1974
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.