State v. Dakota
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Peterson, Justice.
Defendant, Joey Alan Dakota, was convicted in Hennepin County District Court of the crime of aggravated assault in violation of Minn. St. 609.225(1). Appealing from the judgment, he contends: (1) that the trial court erred in not ruling that certain statements made by him before he had been given Miranda warnings tainted and rendered inadmissible other statements made after he had waived his Miranda rights, and (2) that there was prejudicial error in the instructions on self-defense. We affirm.
The assault of which defendant was convicted took place in the basement of a South…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Leyra v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- William James Evans v. United States of America, George William Bruton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- State v. WibergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- State v. VargusSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977
- State v. RaymondSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- State v. JensenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.