Legal Opinion
State v. Jensen
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided May 29, 1984No. CX-83-1719, CX-83-1722PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LESLIE, Judge.
Defendants Jensen and Picha were charged with burglary. After a consolidated omnibus hearing the trial court issued its findings of fact, conclusions of law and order suppressing defendants’ initial confessions, a subsequent taped confession by Jensen, and a drill and drill bits returned by Jensen.
We affirm.
FACTS
On April 7, 1983, Al’s Auto Service in Glenville, Minnesota reported a burglary to the Freeborn County Sheriff’s Department. Numerous items were reported missing, including an air drill and drill bits. Police found no evidence suggesting the burglar’s identity at…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Haynes v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Lynumn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. GardCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. GerringCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. HookomCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- State v. HendricksonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
- State v. CashCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.