Parrish v. Valero Retail Holdings, Inc.
District Court, D. New Mexico
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge.
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Defendant’s Motion to Compel Arbitration and Dismiss or Stay Proceedings, filed April 30, 2010 (Doc. 5). The Court held a hearing on June 11, 2010. The primary issue is whether the arbitration agreement that Plaintiff Rozik Parrish signed as part of Defendant Valero Retail Holdings, Inc.’s (“Valero”) employment application is enforceable, if the consideration was based upon an offer of at-will employment and on a mutuality of obligation to arbitrate. Because the Court finds that adequate…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Presbyterian Healthcare Services v. Goldman, Sachs & Co.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2015
- La Frontera Center, Inc. v. United Behavioral Health, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2017
- BIO-TEC ENVIRONMENTAL, LLC v. AdamsDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2011
- Perez v. Qwest Corp.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2012
- Jerry Erwin Assocs., Inc. v. Estate of AsherDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2017
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.