Legal Opinion

McCall v. Marshall

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1965No. A-10604PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMILTON, Justice.

Respondent Bob Marshall, an Austin automobile dealer, brought suit originally against the petitioners, S. S. McCall, George S. McCall, and H. T. Hibler, doing business as McCall and Hilber Company, an insurance agency. The basis of respondent’s cause of action is the alleged failure by the petitioner McCall and Hibler Company to properly handle Marshall’s insurance coverage concerning his business. Petitioner had sold Marshall a policy issued by the Hartford Fire Insurance Company. Respondent also sued Hartford, contending that the insurance company had issued him a fire…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Royal Indemnity Company v. MarshallTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  2. International & Great Northern Railway Co. v. RagsdaleTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Burroughs v. BunchCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
  4. Denison Light & Power Co. v. PattonTexas Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Diamond v. DuncanTexas Supreme Court · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Rosas v. Buddies Food StoreTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Critchfield v. Smith, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2004
  3. Ostrovitz & Gwinn, LLC v. First Specialty Insurance Company, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2012
  4. Sonic Systems International, Inc. v. Croix, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2009
  5. Sledge v. MullinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1996

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API