Legal Opinion
United States v. Fruehauf
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 24, 1961PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAWSON, District Judge.
This is a motion for an order enlarging defendants’ time to make this motion, and for an order directing the United States of America to file a bill of particulars. The motion to enlarge defendants’ time to make this motion is granted. The motion is considered as a motion for a bill of particulars.
It appears that on June 17, 1959, an indictment of two counts was filed in this court against the defendants, based on section 302(a) of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (29 U.S.C.A. § 186(a) ) which makes it unlawful for any employer to pay or deliver, or to agree…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. FruehaufSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Kempe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
- Rose v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
- United States v. KingDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1954
- United States v. SchillaciDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1958
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. SklaroffDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1971
- Hadder v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
- United States v. LeonelliDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977
- Spector v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- United States v. Mount Fuji Japanese Steak House, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1977