United States v. King
District Court, N.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
FOLEY, District Judge.
The defendant moves pursuant to Rule 7(f) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, 18 U.S.C.A., for a bill of particulars. The particulars are requested in two items set forth in the notice of motion, which is supported by the affidavit of the defendant. The request contained in item “1” is much too broad and is denied.
The defendant is indicted on four counts of alleged income tax evasion, each year of such accusation being embodied in a separate count. The counts are set forth in each instance with the *125amount of income that was reported, and the tax paid thereon, as…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Remmer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
- United States v. CasertaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
- United States v. WexlerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
- United States v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1948
- Singer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1932
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Respondent v. Raymond A. O'COnnOrCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Herman D. Holt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- United States v. FruehaufDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
- United States v. WitbeckDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1954
- United States v. DeGrooteDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.